Exactly 100 Years Since Drugs Banned in US and Europe


.

.

.

It’s exactly 100 years since drugs have been banned in the United States and Europe. 

 

ADDICTION

Everything You Think You Know About Addiction Is Wrong

.

| Johann Hari | TED Talks

.

“We don’t impose that on the rest of the world.”

.

“We take addicts and punish them and make them suffer because we believe that will deter them, to give them an incentive to stop.”

.

“Is there a better way to help them?”

.

He traveled to many places, including “to the only country that has ever decriminalized all drugs from cannabis to crap: Portugal.”

.

“And I realized almost everything we ever knew about addiction is wrong.”

.

.

I recommend reading Heroin Century. It’s an exciting read, extremely well written, actually a “page-turner.” It will help you to understand how prohibition creates addiction and drug wars and narco-states that now have more gold than the rest of the countries in the world combined.

.

The book helps us understand why giving addicts free access to any drug of addiction they desire, in clean settings, where they can get the exact predictable doses they want, and have a rescue remedy available by trained personnel if needed, why that helps. Do the research. They do not die. They do not give each other or give their loved ones HIV/AIDS or hepatitis. It gets rid of drug cartels that have completely taken over many countries in the world. It reduces violence, theft, murder, guns. It may even help doctors stop treating cancer patients like addicts.

 

Once you calculate the cost of street drugs – each addict has to find more than $1 million each year to feed their addiction – you can easily understand how much violence this breeds. It is not only less expensive to give free drugs in supervised, clean addiction centers that also offer treatment for addiction if the addict desires, but addiction is a medical condition. Treatment is humane and it saves lives.

.

Addiction is found in families of the poor, rich and middle class, in farmlands, suburbia and inner cities. One trillion dollars has gone to drug wars that breed more drugs and more war with no treatment. None. Now CDC wants to sharply reduce access to pain medicine for people with chronic pain including chronic cancer pain. That is the wrong answer to 28,000 plus deaths from opioids in 2014. Opioid deaths are growing and CDC sharply cuts everyone’s access to pain medication. Sweet. Solved!

.

Simply ask if your healthcare insurance has ever covered behavioral therapy? And for how many short weeks do they limit treatment? That’s just the start. Most psychiatrists I know will not accept insurance because reimbursement is so low. And this country will not “pander” to anyone who has any emotional problems much less addiction. Buck up America! That’s the attitude in Congress, and insurers know exactly how to read the tone that elects them. It’s not hard, just ask anyone in your family who will likely say the same. Insurers see no reason voters think otherwise. And newspaper headlines do not lead with what is right, they  lead with what sells. Why else would a jury send a doctor to jail for 30 years for prescribing an opioid for pain – and call it murder. The first time in history. Murder charge for prescription opioid. 

.

I have posted addiction tools to help doctors recognize addiction in their patients. Anyone could be an addict. Addicts can be very good actors. Pathological liars. Your cancer doctor will suspect everyone. That surely explains why my colleague took her grandmother to the oncologist at Cedars Sinai and heard the oncologist threaten her grandmother: “If you want pain medicine for your cancer, you’d better go somewhere else or I won’t treat you.” Don’t think this will not happen to you.

 

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

The material on this site is for informational purposes only.

It is not a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis or treatment

provided by a qualified health care provider.

Relevant comments are welcome.

.

If any questions, please schedule an appointment with my office.

This site is not for email.

~~~~~

For My Home Page, click here:  Welcome to my Weblog on Pain Management!

.

.

.

.

.

Please be aware any advertising on this free educational website is

NOT advocated by me and NOT approved by me.

.

.

.

.

 

 

.

.

.

.

.

.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I realized

 

 

War On Opioids Is War On Patients With Pain: Obama Seeks $1.1 Billion to Fight Opioid Abuse


.

.

.

A “war” on opioids is a war on patients with pain. The CDC just radically, across the board, cut access to opioid doses.

.

Obama seeks to fight opioid abuse by arbitrarily limiting access to medication for 100 million patients with chronic pain. This does nothing to help the appalling lack of funding for research on chronic pain.

.

Today, the New York Times announces President Obama is seeking $1.1 billion to fight the opioid epidemic.

.

Obama had already signed a budget agreement in December for $400 million for the same.

.

Imagine war on pain instead of war on addiction, war on drugs. If $1.1 billion were instead spent on finding better pain treatment— would addiction to opioids occur less often? Almost nothing is spent on pain research. Less than half of one per cent of NIH budget in 2008. There are over 20 different splice variants in the mu opioid receptor, some of which are not addicting – research from Gavril Pasternak at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center. Money for research is urgent.

.

Federal agencies have heard about deaths of addicts, deaths of people with pain (addicts?) who overdosed on opioids, heard from families, from police officers but not from people with chronic pain who have no voice. There is no “BALANCE,” no conversation. Only after the American Pain Society appealed CDC’s radical plans, that CDC allowed one partial exclusion in dosage cuts: to allow opioid for cancer patients, but only if undergoing active cancer treatment. However, not for those cancer patients who are not in active cancer treatment, who have severe chronic pain resulting from the cancer itself that destroyed nerves or bone or spinal cord or brain, not for pain from cancer chemotherapy or radiation: you will suffer the same severe sharp drop in opioid allowed for treatment of your chronic pain.

.

Time magazine in 2011 reported: “Serious, chronic pain affects at least 116 million Americans each year, many of whom are inadequately treated by the health-care system, according to a new report by the Institute of Medicine (IOM). The report offers a blueprint for addressing what it calls a “public health crisis” of pain.”

.

“…and the chronic suffering costs the country $560 to $635 billion each year in medical bills, lost productivity and missed work.”

.

“Yet the reports’ authors said they believed that they had actually underestimated the incidence of chronic pain — that which lasts 30 to 60 days or more and takes a toll on personal and professional life — because their data didn’t include people living in settings like nursing homes. Further, as baby boomers age, the rate of chronic pain increases daily.”

.

Unless you have experienced pain yourself, it is very hard to understand pain in others and to accept the fact that disabling severe pain can exist without obvious signs of fracture or other obvious causes. And if you are among the tens of millions who cannot afford the $10,000 or $5,000 deductible for medicine and doctor visits, heroin is cheap and can be found everywhere – death is the risk thanks to the American healthcare system that will not cover cost of your needs.

.

Before we have an effective alternative,

CDC wants to take opioids away.

.

Yes, side effects are a huge problem, but thanks to some relief from opioids, people are working or able to function. Since the sudden DEA conference late October 2015 announcing limits, I have been deeply concerned about the direction the American government is taking to deny medication for people with chronic pain. I have posted ten times on this radical nationwide experiment since October! – see many articles at top left below my photo. The CDC suddenly imposed limits on opioid medication for treatment of chronic pain, setting the daily opioid dose to be 100 mg morphine or its equivalent. Yet for years healthcare insurers have refused almost all forms of treatment with the exception of opioids, see the detailed list of FACTS at that link. Now the opioids are the last frontier, the final culprit. And then what? . . . nothing?

,

There is no data to support this radical nationwide experiment. Many concerns of the American Pain Society were completely ignored. The anti-opioidists have won.

.

People with chronic pain seem to be content to lose or to think that a few pain specialists can win their denials for drug coverage, while healthcare insurers’ profits go up by refusing to pay, by demanding “prior authorizations” that require doctors to jump one hurdle of forms after another, until finally, always: DENIED. This has gone on for years, vast, time consuming denials rather than practice of medicine. The more expensive the drug, the quicker and more comprehensive are the denials.

.

Bottom line, insurers profit. CDC is interested in deaths from opioids, and they think training doctors in opioids is the same as training in pain management. I have made more than enough arguments on this site for years, and spent more than 15 years in better ways to treat pain.

.

Just this moment, three letters of denial from insurance for 20 mg morphine, not 100 mg, no, they are denying a mere 20 mg, for severe pain, multiple diagnoses causing pain, “in accordance with CMS (Centers for Medicare …) guidelines.” That is the “training” in opioids. Why waste our time giving MD’s credit for 4 or 5 hours of training, and obtaining millions of dollars from pharmaceutical companies who make opioids for this “training,” in order for the DEA to go around the country “training” us, when opioids are being denied anyway? Denials for 20 mg morphine is not training. 

.

Americans need to take action through the American Pain Society.

.

..

I have written recently about the radical CDC opioid guidelines:

 

Tapering patients without sound and attainable alternatives

.

Tampering with patient autonomy

.

Failure to provide informed consent

.

Avoidance of coercion

.

Nonmeleficence – Do No Harm – Primum non nocere

.

Treating patients like numbers not individualized

.

Intellectual and academic dishonesty

.

Anti-opioid zealots supported by zealous insurers? 

.

Containment of drug costs, not pain

.

Failure to assess risk vs benefit

.

.

etc, etc – refer to prior posts

.

These arbitrary actions are mind numbing and hopeless until voices of millions become united. Elected officials cannot afford to ignore the mounting deaths from prescription opioids that are killing white people. Clearly they can afford to ignore 116 million Americans with serious chronic pain.

.

.

.

.

 

 

The material on this site is for informational purposes only.

It is not a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis or treatment provided by a qualified health care provider.

Relevant comments are welcome.

If any questions, please schedule an appointment with my office.

This site is not for email.

~~~~~

For My Home Page, click here:  Welcome to my Weblog on Pain Management!

.

.

.

.

.

Please be aware any advertising on this free website is

NOT advocated by me and NOT approved by me.

.

.

.

.

 

 

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

Haunted by the dirty work of managed care & that deadly piece of paper: “Denied”


·

“I know how managed care maims and kills patients”

·

I will never forget the snarly laughter of a “medical” reviewer two weeks ago as he denied medication to my patient that the same PPO had been authorizing for years. My patient has been haunted by the man’s laughter since then. Denial of continuing medication is happening more and more despite California law that “grandfathers” in ongoing care for previously covered medication. See my post here.

It is “DESUETUDE.” It refers to the condition where a law has gone unenforced for so long that it is considered ‘obsolete.’ The law has not been repealed, but — here’s the clincher — the law has “collapsed into unenforcibility.” (quote from William M. Lamers, Jr, MD)

For years we have had spreadsheet medicine: Denial only for medication that is costly. It’s getting worse, more brazen.

Now that much new medication is unaffordable, priced far beyond the rate of a decade of inflation, what do we do with lawmakers that will not negotiate volume discount prices with pharmaceutical companies? How long will the middle class be able to afford common medication?  There isn’t another first world country on the planet that does not negotiate volume pricing.

Why are safe older pain medications being taken off the formulary?

Did you know that prices on best selling medicines may go up as much as 20 to 30% each year, though they’ve been on the market for years?

What is worse, managed care bloodlessly denies life saving procedures. A bloodless coup that rarely makes the news.

Physician Confesses to Congress, Choking Back Tears

Dr. Lynn DiPino [spelling?], former medical reviewer for Humana went before Congress to make “a public confession.”

This doctor, who acted as a reviewer for an insurance company, denied life saving surgery for a man and thus caused his death, saving “the company half a million dollars.”

Her decision to deny surgery insured her continued advancement in healthcare. “I went from making a few hundred dollars a week as a medical reviewer to an escalating six figure income as a physician executive.” “I was told repeatedly I was not denying care, I was simply denying payment. I know how managed care maims and kills patients. So I am here to tell you about the dirty work of managed care.”

As the video continues on the origins of managed care, it goes back to February 17, 1971, when Ehrlichman discusses Kaiser HMO with President Richard Nixon : “All the incentives are for less medical care because the less care they give, the more profit they make.”

Nixon smiles, his eyes narrow as if he is savoring fine wine, and says, “Not bad.”

Health Insurers Refuse to Limit Rescission of Coverage

withering criticism from Republican and Democratic Congress members

Today in Los Angeles Times

Even Republicans were appalled when “[e]xecutives of three of the nation’s largest health insurers told federal lawmakers in Washington on Tuesday that they would continue canceling medical coverage for some sick policyholders, despite withering criticism from Republican and Democratic members of Congress who decried the practice as unfair and abusive….

An investigation by the House Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations showed that health insurers WellPoint Inc.[parent of Blue Cross of California], UnitedHealth Group and Assurant Inc. canceled the coverage of more than 20,000 people, allowing the companies to avoid paying more than $300 million in medical claims over a five-year period.

It also found that policyholders with breast cancer, lymphoma and more than 1,000 other conditions were targeted for rescission and that employees were praised in performance reviews for terminating the policies of customers with expensive illnesses.

…Rescission was largely hidden until three years ago, when The Times launched a series of stories disclosing that insurers routinely canceled the medical coverage of individual policyholders who required expensive medical care.

…A Texas nurse said she lost her coverage, after she was diagnosed with aggressive breast cancer, for failing to disclose a visit to a dermatologist for acne.

The sister of an Illinois man who died of lymphoma said his policy was rescinded for the failure to report a possible aneurysm and gallstones that his physician noted in his chart but did not discuss with him.

The committee’s investigation found that WellPoint’s Blue Cross targeted individuals with more than 1,400 conditions, including breast cancer, lymphoma, pregnancy and high blood pressure. And the committee obtained documents that showed Blue Cross supervisors praised employees in performance reviews for rescinding policies.

One employee, for instance, received a perfect 5 for “exceptional performance” on an evaluation that noted the employee’s role in dropping thousands of policyholders and avoiding nearly $10 million worth of medical care.

…Late in the hearing, Stupak, the committee chairman, put the executives on the spot. Stupak asked each of them whether he would at least commit his company to immediately stop rescissions except where they could show “intentional fraud.”

The answer from all three executives:

“No.”

Rep. John Dingell (D-Mich.) said that a public insurance plan should be a part of any overhaul because it would force private companies to treat consumers fairly or risk losing them.

“This is precisely why we need a public option,” Dingell said.

…In November 2007, The Times reported that insurer Health Net Inc. paid bonuses to employees based in part on their involvement in rescinding policies. According to internal corporate documents disclosed through litigation, Health Net saved $35 million over six years by rescinding policies.

The disclosures in part led an arbitration judge to levy $9 million in damages against Health Net in a case involving the company’s rescission of the policy of a woman diagnosed with breast cancer.

At the time, Blue Cross told The Times that it did not link employee performance reviews to rescission. Blue Cross also said at the time that it had conducted audits to ensure that claims reviewers were not given any “carrots” for canceling coverage.

The company reiterated that position Tuesday in spite of the committee’s disclosure of two employee performance evaluations from 2003 discussing rescission levels and savings.

~~~~~

The material on this site is for informational purposes only.

It is not a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis or treatment provided by a qualified health care provider.

To Find My Home Page, click here:  Welcome to my Weblog on Pain Management!

~~~~~~~

.


%d bloggers like this: